|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
1013
   |
Posted - 2013.01.17 07:11:00 -
[1] - Quote
Posting to say that POSs need a COMPLETE overhaul and has for many years. If deployment is an issue, then just add in new modular POSs and allow a transition period before removing the old ones.
IMHO redoing POSs should be top on CCPs list, the positive effects it can have on the game as a whole, far out weigh any new V3 or ****** new frig. |
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
1015
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 10:08:00 -
[2] - Quote
http://eve-search.com/thread/391410-0/page/1
After 6-7 years this has become more then just flogging a horse, but still is an elephant in the room for CCP. But who cares about the vocal minority right. |
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
1016
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 10:47:00 -
[3] - Quote
diabel wrote:they will be working on dust514 instead of eve
This will probably be the sad truth. We will see more Dust integration then we will POS improvements.
|
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
1030
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 17:24:00 -
[4] - Quote
CCP Gargant wrote: CCP has only stated that THE OVERHAUL CANNOT HAPPEN ALL AT ONCE
It's been on the table and asked about for over 6 years now. CCP has stated alot of things over those years and has yet to deliver, only ignore. I doubt many are expecting an overnight miracle(especially when dealing with CCP) however continuing to delay doesn't strike much confidence within your customers. Hence the rage.
|
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
1033
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 18:49:00 -
[5] - Quote
Two step wrote:
Again, I'd like to remind folks that are actually reading this thread to keep things civil and constructive. Going all nutso will only hurt the chances of getting CCP to work on POSes.
While I agree with this to some point, however how long should the playerbase play nice? This has been discussed and almost unanimously support from the playerbase for years, yet it has remained a elephant in the room. While many would not wish to resort to rage, it seems to be the only effective measure to get CCP support, as history would show.
Development on this should have started shortly after Apocrapha, especially with the explosion of POS use when wormholes where released. Yet it does not seem that CCP even cares or has even started working on it.
|
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
1034
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 19:11:00 -
[6] - Quote
Two step wrote:
Lets try playing nice until the planning process is done, to start with.
Well your no fun.
|
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
1034
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 19:48:00 -
[7] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:I used to take care of 5 POSes doing sylramic reactions. I still wake up in a sweat thinking I have to set it up again, or repurpose the POSes.
Had 12 at one point. I guess that's why I'm so bitter now. |
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
1034
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 20:14:00 -
[8] - Quote
Darth Skorpius wrote:I'd like to point out one part of POS's that annoys the **** out of me. They are called PLAYER Owned Structures, but a better name for them would be CORP Owned Structures. They are so heavily reliant on corp roles that the only way to have a personal POS is to be in your own one person corp. When you eventually get around to fixing POS's, please make them truly PLAYER owned again.
A corp is generally made up of players.
Really individual POSs isn't something I would be all crazy about. However improving POSs to the point where individuals wouldn't have the need for personal POSs is the direction it should go. |
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
1041
|
Posted - 2013.01.18 11:36:00 -
[9] - Quote
So how many pages do we need in order to show that POSs are not just for a "small portion of the community"? And that contrary to what CCP thinks, the playerbase does not expect it to be ALL RELEASED AT ONCE. What we want is for CCP to actually START on it.
Same goes for Corporation Roles..... |
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
1046
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 11:17:00 -
[10] - Quote
Your turn CCP.. The "small portion" has spoken. |
|
|
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
1047
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 16:42:00 -
[11] - Quote
A lot of words just to say SoonGäó. |
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
1049
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 18:19:00 -
[12] - Quote
Lady Zarrina wrote:Well CCP, thanks for some clarification on your thoughts. Many players have given theirs. You have bought a month and a bit of time. Please use it wisely.
If your new process does not allow you to address what needs to be fixed... you have much bigger issues than POS's.
Considering the scale and potential POSs have on Eve as a whole, I would doubt there's many issues that are bigger atm.
|
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
1933
|
Posted - 2014.05.26 14:53:00 -
[13] - Quote
So still a dead horse, gotcha.
CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it.
Improving NPE-á/ Dynamic New Eden |
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
1935
|
Posted - 2014.05.26 17:28:00 -
[14] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Malc: They're working in structures, look they even made a picture to make it easy to understand
Frying: Lies, all lies! Every piece of good news is a lie because I'm literally addictde to drama and I need a scandal like a junkie needs a wrap of ******
Malc: No they're not lying, I have every reason to believe they mean it.
Brooks Puntai: herpa derp that must mean they're lying because I'd rather biomass than ever admit any piece of good news into my cramped cerebellum.
Actually its more out of history of dealing with CCP. They always talk a good game and even give hints on what they work on, HOWEVER it rarely pans out. So I'll believe it when I see it. I mean it isn't like this idea has been around for 8 years...Oh wait it has.
If you want to believe them then so be it, and I hope you are right, but I still have my doubts...
E: They CBA to change the model on the Nag to add an extra turret. So them completely revamping POSs, which they seem to not wanna do, shouldn't be surprising that people have skepticism.
CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it.
Improving NPE-á/ Dynamic New Eden |
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
1936
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 04:52:00 -
[15] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:They haven't even solved world hunger either.
Also: Nag works just fine as it is, even if that wasn't a ship balancing/art team issue.
They haven't even made a "Logout" button yet, but I'm guessing they showed their volunteer PR staff a picture or maybe a graph on that aswell. World hunger is abit out of their league, also pointless analogy.
Nag just shows they are more willing to take the easy/lazy way out instead of the right way.
Back to the original topic.
Has CCP even released that "picture" to the public or was that only a CSM only thing? Last comment I've heard about it was a year ago in this thread, and ofc your little "they showed us a picture guyz!" which doesn't bode well to their development of it.
CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it.
Improving NPE-á/ Dynamic New Eden |
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
1936
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 05:31:00 -
[16] - Quote
Touche
CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it.
Improving NPE-á/ Dynamic New Eden |
|
|
| |
|